Difference between revisions of "Deaconess"
m (Category) |
(→Feminist subversion of the title) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Feminist subversion of the title== | ==Feminist subversion of the title== | ||
| − | In postmodern times, there is a movement among [[World Orthodox]] and [[Roman Catholics]] which pretends to seek "restoration" of deaconesses, while what they actually advocate is something completely different. The [[heresy|heretical]] feminist movement for female [[ordination]] has already succeeded in subverting and indeed, destroying, large sections of protestantism.<ref>[https://www.christianpost.com/news/worlds-first-openly-lesbian-bishop-to-remove-crosses-build-islamic-prayer-room-in-swedish-seamens-church.html Just one example of many].</ref> | + | In postmodern times, there is a movement among [[World Orthodox]] and [[Roman Catholics]] which pretends to seek "restoration" of deaconesses, while what they actually advocate is something completely different.<ref>https://nftu.net/world-orthodox-gather-support-womens-ordination/</ref><ref>https://gab.com/BishopEnoch787/posts/112412300418392850</ref> The [[heresy|heretical]] feminist movement for female [[ordination]] has already succeeded in subverting and indeed, destroying, large sections of protestantism.<ref>[https://www.christianpost.com/news/worlds-first-openly-lesbian-bishop-to-remove-crosses-build-islamic-prayer-room-in-swedish-seamens-church.html Just one example of many].</ref> |
| − | The movement employs the so-called motte and bailey fallacy: in order to advance their agenda they demand "deaconesses" which are not in fact historic deaconesses but female deacons, something which has never existed. But when their claims are attacked, they defend it by referring to the historical practice of deaconesses, which is not the same as what they are fighting for.<ref>https://fatherjohn.blogspot.com/2024/03/deaconesses-female-deacons-and-agenda.html</ref> They are already succeeding in World Orthodoxy: The [[Alexandrian Patriarchate]] and [[GOARCH]] have women openly serving | + | The movement employs the so-called motte and bailey fallacy: in order to advance their agenda they demand "deaconesses" which are not in fact historic deaconesses but female deacons, something which has never existed. But when their claims are attacked, they defend it by referring to the historical practice of deaconesses, which is not the same as what they are fighting for.<ref>https://fatherjohn.blogspot.com/2024/03/deaconesses-female-deacons-and-agenda.html</ref> They are already succeeding in World Orthodoxy: The [[Alexandrian Patriarchate]],<ref>https://www.orthodoxethos.com/post/a-public-statement-on-orthodox-deaconesses-by-concerned-clergy-and-laity-updated-56-signatories</ref> [[GOARCH]]<ref>https://orthochristian.com/153650.html</ref><ref>https://stpaulsirvine.org/parish-history/</ref>, and others have women openly serving in roles ranging from [[acolyte|acolytes]] to deacons. |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 14 May 2024
Deaconesses were a women assigned to perform certain functions in the early church. Their assistance was required because for reasons of modesty, the clergy could not do for women everything which they did for men. Deaconesses would assist with baptisms—which at that time were performed in the nude—so that the priest could stand behind a barrier and not see anything. Similarly they would assist with visiting women to distribute alms, and maintaining order in the women's side of the church.
Deaconesses were older, celibate women and their role was subsumed into that of nuns.
- This article or section is a stub. If you wish to help True Orthodox Wiki you may expand it. Request an account if you do not already have one.
Feminist subversion of the title
In postmodern times, there is a movement among World Orthodox and Roman Catholics which pretends to seek "restoration" of deaconesses, while what they actually advocate is something completely different.[1][2] The heretical feminist movement for female ordination has already succeeded in subverting and indeed, destroying, large sections of protestantism.[3]
The movement employs the so-called motte and bailey fallacy: in order to advance their agenda they demand "deaconesses" which are not in fact historic deaconesses but female deacons, something which has never existed. But when their claims are attacked, they defend it by referring to the historical practice of deaconesses, which is not the same as what they are fighting for.[4] They are already succeeding in World Orthodoxy: The Alexandrian Patriarchate,[5] GOARCH[6][7], and others have women openly serving in roles ranging from acolytes to deacons.
References
- ↑ https://nftu.net/world-orthodox-gather-support-womens-ordination/
- ↑ https://gab.com/BishopEnoch787/posts/112412300418392850
- ↑ Just one example of many.
- ↑ https://fatherjohn.blogspot.com/2024/03/deaconesses-female-deacons-and-agenda.html
- ↑ https://www.orthodoxethos.com/post/a-public-statement-on-orthodox-deaconesses-by-concerned-clergy-and-laity-updated-56-signatories
- ↑ https://orthochristian.com/153650.html
- ↑ https://stpaulsirvine.org/parish-history/
